|
Ideas
Jun 6, 2006 20:38:19 GMT -5
Post by Bill on Jun 6, 2006 20:38:19 GMT -5
Hi, I have to cool ideas for mass marketing... The first one: You know that guy Matthew Lesko on late night TV dressed in the suit with the question marks all over it? Well that's what we're going to do with econocank! We'll have joe dressed in a suit with exclamation marks all over it running around screaming about econocank and how great it is. It will about a book called free music. You'll also be able to order the whole econocank catalog etc... www.avababy.com/images/lesko.htmlwww.governmentgrant.com/Next Idea is the DegiDrive. The DegiDrive will be a 100GB hard disk with all of degicank.com's content that you can order.
|
|
|
Ideas
Jun 6, 2006 20:42:19 GMT -5
Post by Bill on Jun 6, 2006 20:42:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Ideas
Jun 6, 2006 20:47:07 GMT -5
Post by Bill on Jun 6, 2006 20:47:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Ideas
Jun 6, 2006 21:00:15 GMT -5
Post by chriscank on Jun 6, 2006 21:00:15 GMT -5
I was at KirkStock, and this subway musician, Darren Deicide had match books with his logo and info on them. We should do this. I was even thinking about a matchbook size book with pinnays in them for concerts...with just a squiddy on the cover of the book. What do you guys think....too guerilla? too illegal? too crank caller?
|
|
|
Ideas
Jun 7, 2006 0:45:54 GMT -5
Post by Ben on Jun 7, 2006 0:45:54 GMT -5
I think it would be best to continue getting people to the web site. Actually you could break it down, but everything leads to the site.
So Pat panang T-shirt (www.degicank.com) Lighters and Matches Logo and degicank.com Internet Links through other's websites / homepages Flyer for a show with degicank.com etc., etc., etc.
I think the best advertisment for what degicank has to offer is going to be the website. Save some money on that suit for Joe. Not to mention the $16,000 for a commercial on a 3rd rate channel.
If a multi-millionaire happens upon the group we might be able to convince them to rent a billboard in SF. $700 - $2500 per month for one billboard.
|
|
|
Ideas
Jun 7, 2006 1:33:39 GMT -5
Post by degicank on Jun 7, 2006 1:33:39 GMT -5
nice ideas!!!!!!!!!
lETS GET THAT BILL BOARD!!!
|
|
|
Ideas
Jun 13, 2006 21:50:00 GMT -5
Post by unoclay on Jun 13, 2006 21:50:00 GMT -5
Actually you'd only need a thousand-aire to rent the billboard at those prices.
|
|
|
Ideas
Jun 14, 2006 6:27:00 GMT -5
Post by DrCank on Jun 14, 2006 6:27:00 GMT -5
I want to rent the billboard on I-95 that you can see from Hunsinggers back yard.
|
|
|
Ideas
Jun 14, 2006 18:48:02 GMT -5
Post by unoclay on Jun 14, 2006 18:48:02 GMT -5
Make it say "disco biscuits rule suckaz" and im in
|
|
|
Ideas
Jun 14, 2006 18:51:19 GMT -5
Post by Bill on Jun 14, 2006 18:51:19 GMT -5
include "degicank.com" and I'm down too.
|
|
|
Ideas
Jun 14, 2006 19:47:17 GMT -5
Post by chriscank on Jun 14, 2006 19:47:17 GMT -5
If I can add the squid anywhere, I'm in too.
|
|
|
Ideas
Jun 15, 2006 1:13:17 GMT -5
Post by ben1133779911 on Jun 15, 2006 1:13:17 GMT -5
Billboard reads: For a good time...www.degicank.com...join us, yes!
|
|
|
Ideas
Jun 16, 2006 10:34:26 GMT -5
Post by unoclay on Jun 16, 2006 10:34:26 GMT -5
If the billboard reads:
The billboard reads: For a good time. . . read billboards I am in too
then i am in too, for sure.
|
|
|
Ideas
Jun 16, 2006 14:03:21 GMT -5
Post by chriscank on Jun 16, 2006 14:03:21 GMT -5
So far the new Degicank Billboard could look like this:
|
|
fibonacci
Pre Panangian
0-1-1-2-3-5-8-13-21
Posts: 40
|
Ideas
Jun 17, 2006 18:17:22 GMT -5
Post by fibonacci on Jun 17, 2006 18:17:22 GMT -5
EDF 5402 Assignment 4
1. For the main effect of the first factor: H0 = á1 = á2 = 0
For the main effect of the second factor: H0 = â1 = â2 = â3 = 0
For the interaction effect: H0 = (áâ)jk = 0 for all j and k
2. Please see attached output. The corresponding p-values for the three hypothesis tests are: For the first factor: p = .147; For the second factor: p = .038; For the interaction effect: p = .015
Based on these p-values, we do not have enough evidence to reject the null for the first hypothesis. However, we do have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis for the second and third hypotheses. There is not sufficient evidence to support a significant main effect for Factor A. There is sufficient evidence to support a significant main effect for Factor B, as well as a significant interaction between Factors A and B.
3. Please see attached graphs. Looking at the graph, one can see that the lines are not parallel, indicating an interaction effect between Factors A and B. This is consistent with the test of the AB interaction.
4. The interaction effect can be interpreted as the effect of Factor A (sex) depends on the effect of Factor B (physical attractiveness) with regard to scores on the Rotter I-E scale (a measure of internal-external control).
5. Ó á2j = (p-1)(MSA-MSWCELL) Ó â2j = (p-1)(MSB-MSWCELL) Ó Ó(áâ)2jk = (p-1)(q-1)(MSAB-MSWCELL nq nq n
= (2-1)(18.778-8.456) = (3-1)(31-8.456) = (2-1)(3-1)(40.778-8.456) 18 12 6 = .573 = 3.757 = 10.774
ù2Y\A*B, AB = Ó á2j / p ó2 + Ó á2j / p
= .573/2 8.456 + .573/2
= .032, which falls in the middle of the small to moderate association range
ù2Y\B*A, AB = Ó â2k / q ó2 + Ó â2k / q
= 3.757/3 8.456 + 3.757/3
= .129, which falls toward the large end of the moderate to large association range
ù2Y\AB, A,B = Ó Ó(áâ)2jk / pq ó2 + Ó Ó(áâ)2jk
= 10.774/6 8.456 + 10.774/6
= .560, which is a very large association
6. Factor B Interaction AB
ë = pqn ù2 ë = pqn ù2 1- ù2 1-ù2
= (2)(3)(6) .129 = (2)(3)(6) .560 1-.129 1-.560
= (36)(.148) = (36) 1.273
= 5.33 = 45.82
Power of the tests, using the NCDF.F function in SPSS is .49 for B and .9999 for AB.
7. Using v1 = p-1 = 1 and v2 = pq (n-1) = 6(n-1) and Table E.13 in Kirk, we need an n of 10 to detect the treatment effect for Factor B and an n of 2 to detect the interaction effect for AB, given the effect size computed in Question 5( assuming 1 – â = .80 and á = .5).
8. With a p-value of .394, the quadratic trend for Factor B is not significant. As such, we do not have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis (there is no quadratic trend for Factor B).
9. With a p-value of .018, the A x ØBquad interaction is significant. As such, we have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis (that the quadratic trend for Factor B depends on the effect of Factor A).
10. a. The quadratic trend is only significant at a2, (females).
b. This provides more information because in question 9 we only knew that the trend was significant, not the level of where it was significant.
c. These results make sense. In question 8 all levels of Factor A (males and females) were considered together. In the simple trend analyses, the trend is tested at each level individually (for both males and females—levels a1 and a2).
|
|